MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER VS JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), MLS started an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application filed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Even though MLS disputed the application, Jordan Older in the end opted to abandon his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, heard by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), followed the typical practice in trademark law, where larger organisations, such as Major League Soccer, aim to safeguard their brand by opposing smaller applications. Jordan Older, despite the opposition from MLS, succeeded to avoid a extended legal dispute by choosing to abandon the application on his own terms, thus avoiding potentially costly and drawn-out litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with legal assistant support from Nicole M. Thier. Initially, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer expected from Older by April 25, 2018. Nonetheless, the matter was quickly resolved on 5 April 2018, when the case was dismissed and terminated. The rapid conclusion suggests that Jordan Older effectively navigated the complexities of the opposition process by opting to withdraw the mark, settling the case before any significant legal disputes developed.

This outcome demonstrates Older’s ability to bring the matter to a conclusion efficiently, avoiding what click here could have been an challenging legal battle from a major sports entity. His decision to voluntarily abandon the mark highlights his tactical choice, letting him to evade the expenses and extended proceedings typical in trademark disputes. Though Major League Soccer’s opposition never attained a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case shows how individual applicants can use careful legal decisions to avoid conflicts with powerful companies without engaging in extended litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.

Report this page